Head of the water department in Ferghana, Osh Oblast describes how the new concrete irrigation canals permit water to travel a lot farther and faster, rather than being absorbed into the ground.

AKDN / Nicholas McGrath

Complex border, divided communities

The Soviet era saw massive industrialisation and investment in infrastructure and public services in Central Asia, but left a complex legacy of ethnic tension and environmental problems.

Tortuous, centrally planned borders criss-cross the region, often leaving Uzbek, Kyrgyz and Tajik communities on different sides of increasingly harder borders, but reliant on the same shared natural resources of land and water.

The legacy of the new borders has seen clusters of marooned “enclaves”, concentrated around the fragile borders of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. As the head of the district water department in Ferghana on the Kyrgyz side of the Kyrgyz-Uzbek border explained: “A significant part of the population here are Uzbeks. The rest are Kyrgyz. We grew up together. We are the same people. Lots of people have family relations across the border. My sister married an Uzbek and lives in Uzbekistan.”

Water for irrigating the primary crop in the region, wheat, and land for grazing livestock are under intense pressure, but sources have been partitioned across hard borders. He continued:

“During the Soviet era people were collectivised and water was piped directly to collective farms. When the Soviet system ended, governance of water collapsed. Families were taking water as they wanted. Irrigation canals were badly damaged.”

In the ensuing collapse, government budgets disappeared overnight, and transition from a state centric model of free services to a market economy saw the establishment of community-run Water User Associations (WUA), to relieve pressure on local government.

As a local WUA member in Osh District explained: “The local government couldn’t afford to manage water anymore. In the past water was free. But slowly fees were introduced. There was a lot of resistance. People said ‘Why should we pay for water from God?’ We had to establish a conflict mitigation committee to deal with disputes in the community over access to water.”