You are here

You are here

  • This AKAH water installation ensures local households have access to clean and safe water. Before, people drank from irrigation channels, which caused health problems such as diarrhoea, skin infections, eye infections and hepatitis. The community paid for 30 percent of the project and now pays a monthly fee for its upkeep.
    AKDN / Christopher Wilton-Steer
Mobilising communities on the frontlines of climate change adaptation: An interview with Onno Ruhl

Onno Ruhl is the first General Manager of the Aga Khan Agency for Habitat (AKAH), which was created in 2016 to address the increasing threat posed by natural disasters and climate change. The agency works to ensure that communities are as safe as possible from the effects of natural disasters, that residents who live in high-risk areas are able to cope in terms of preparedness and response, and that they have access to social and financial services that lead to greater opportunity and a better quality of life.

Tell us about the work of AKAH. How did the agency come about?

AKAH is a new agency, but it is not new in the sense that it is actually built on the legacy of a number of organisations that existed in the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN). His Highness the Aga Khan realised that the intensity, in terms of frequency but also severity, of natural disasters all over the world had gotten much worse. From that perspective, the solutions that worked to keep the community safe in the last 20 years were unlikely to be good enough to keep the community safe 20 years, let alone 50 years, going forward.

His Highness said the work should no longer be about understanding the habitat in terms of “what is” but in terms of “what ought to be”. And the way we've now formulated that in our own strategy is to move our work from planning for safety to planning for opportunity, even in the face of increasing risk.

What role do communities play in “planning for opportunity”?

Mobilising communities started as a compliment to mapping the physical risk [of natural disasters] in each of the communities where we work. That means that you send geologists and community mobilisers – because the community needs to allow you to do it – to literally go to a village and map the physical assets. So we have, as intellectual capital in our agency, the hazard vulnerability and risk assessments of 2,207 communities in India, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Afghanistan.

Now, the combination of the survey and geology skills that we have, and the ability to work with the GIS [Geographic Information System] databases, is the same skill set that one would need to use for planning. So the logic is to build on the existing skills and build a methodology to allow us to work with these communities to plan.

But planning has no value if you just start planning a community without engagement. The community will either ignore what you do or it might turn hostile, because who are we to make a plan for the community? So it requires two really important aspects of engagement. First with the community itself, and then very importantly, with the government responsible for the particular geography.

Why is this an important part of the world to be engaging and thinking about these issues of climate and habitat?

It is well known that there are two ice caps that are melting in the world: the North Pole and the South Pole. What not so many people realise is that the third largest concentration of ice in the world, sometimes referred to as the "Third Pole", is the Himalayan mountain range. And it is a very different geography. There are no polar bears there. There are people living there, and they are as threatened as the polar bears. And when you go downstream, that "Third Pole" is actually the watershed that feeds 1.5 billion people in Asia, stretching all the way from Afghanistan to Vietnam, and into China, Central Asia, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. So there are really compelling reasons to work in this area, because it is one of the most important frontlines of climate change adaptation.

People love to talk about climate change mitigation. But people often forget that about 200 million people in the world today are already at risk in their habitat because of climate change that has already happened. Therefore, there are really compelling reasons to work in these geographies. You cannot just move 200 million people, there is no way that would work. We have to work with these people to adapt to where they are.

The second reason why we work there is because these are the areas where the AKDN historically has engaged for a very long time. And this is therefore where we are rooted in these communities in a way that allows us to do things that, I think I can say with some confidence, other development networks wouldn't be able to do.

Mountains are often seen as marginal. And it is often thought that it's just a hopeless cause to allow mountain people to thrive because it's just such a difficult environment. At the AKDN, we do not accept that. Switzerland, over 200 years, managed to turn the mountains into an incredible competitive advantage and become one of the very richest countries in the world. Other mountain communities, over the long term, should be able to thrive and maintain their heritage and benefit from the mountains and not depopulate these beautiful areas.


Children walking home in Barsem, Tajikistan. A nearby lake caused a mudflow in 2015, triggered by high temperatures and rapid snow and glacier melt. The lake submerged the road, energy lines, farms and homes. AKAH has helped the community recover with new housing, water systems and other infrastructure.
AKDN / Christopher Wilton-Steer

What are the other major areas of work for the agency?

I think it is important to talk about AKAH’s bread and butter, which is water supply and sanitation.

Over the last 18 years the AKDN has provided piped water into the homes of half a million households. Ten years in, we were asked to evaluate what had been built. Ninety-six percent of the schemes were still operating according to World Health Organization standard.

The reason so many of them kept working is the same reason they worked in the first place: The engineering is really good, and there was a lot of attention to having the right water source to get the quality we need. But the reason it keeps working is because the community helped build it, and we trained members of the community to do the regular maintenance. Not repair after it breaks, but regular maintenance.

The first time I saw one of these schemes, they gave me a glass of water so I did this thing where you close your mouth and [pretend to take a sip]. My CEO from Pakistan, he saw that and he said, "No, no, you can drink it". I said, “I'm a foreigner, I'm not used to the water here, I'll get sick.” He said, "If you can drink Evian, you can drink this." So I drank it. It was absolutely fine.

And it's important because I think what we do in developing countries should be as good or better in terms of quality as what we do anywhere in the world. They need quality more than anybody else.

How are some of these issues different for women and girls?

Planning for opportunity means you no longer just think about how the community can survive, but how they can, over time, lift themselves out of poverty. So if you do that, then it's really important to realise that that's an intergenerational move.

Now in most societies where we work, the traditional image would be that the sons of the family would follow the footsteps of the father. To keep it simple, if they are farmers, the sons will likely be farmers. Then you suddenly realise that if even just one of the girls can become a nurse, which is possible in the AKDN, the entire family would have an entirely different future.

So that’s an example of a family. If you multiply that, you do not just focus on the young, you focus on the female young because that is where the biggest delta is.

I say that not meaning anything against boys. They can and should make the best of their lives, too. But if you actually focus on empowering the girl child, [development] can go very fast, I believe.

What inspires you to do this work?

I like to tell the story of a village which was hit by a glacial lake flood. There was lots of work on an early warning system, glacier monitoring using drones, all sorts of fancy stuff [to identify the risk].

But in the end, it is two boys with a flag, sitting on a hill slope looking at a glacier, and two boys on the other side, watching for the flag to warn that the risk materialised and it is time to evacuate the people. That's community mobilisation. By combining community mobilisation and science, we can boil it down to the confidence that four boys staying awake all night can save, in this case, 250 people whose houses were flooded.

I spent my career in development. And the more I travelled and the more I talked to people about development and tried to understand it, the more I realised that the answers do not lie in the contributions of outsiders, they rely on what community itself can do.

Onno Ruhl is the General Manager of the Aga Khan Agency for Habitat (AKAH). Mr Ruhl held positions in the World Bank, as country director for Nigeria, and more recently as country director for India.

This article was first published on the AKF USA website.